Future Past Notes :: Un-Predict-able
- maria-tudo

- 30 de nov. de 2023
- 13 min de leitura
Atualizado: 7 de mai. de 2025

Circular Postcard No. 41 | collage 3 pieces | 2014
:: First Notes
This message was composed in layers across time, firstly between March and September 2021, and now resumed in November 2023, as follows:
Rewinding further back, the creative process of the above Circular Postcard started during the first series in 2012, with the full white background image. During the second series in 2014, the blue fountain-pen (in portuguese caneta de tinta permanente) was added and then the word Software found its way through to complete the insight.
Fast forward to 2020-2021, for months this postcard kept coming to mind as intro to a message that was yet to be. In March 2021 i finally took the hint and started this message, only containing the postcard plus its backside bilingual phrase and a partial title yet to be confirmed.
On March 18, 2021, i woke up with two words, the first a number in english, the second a colour in portuguese. The first thing that came to mind was this Postcard and its inherent message. I added those two words to it and let it be.
On April 24, 2021, i woke up from a shortly slept night where dream time felt like waking time, all around the next contents to jump start this message.
I then removed the postcard backside bilingual phrase and the above mentioned two words. Over the next months i added visual pieces, several paragraphs and several Notes. After more than two years without further additions, i didn't expect to come back to it. But i was yet to find out whether it had lost its momentum or it was on standby.
In the morning of November 18, 2023, after having watched a currently disturbing movie the previous night, i woke up with a new and surprising hint, connecting dots that i knew well but hadn't put together the way they were being presented now, bridging my previous I.M.possible Future :: Breaking the Habit (I and II) with some other offline Notes taken after viewing certain equally disturbing contents online last September. I knew this hint meant i had to compose the next message.
Before i actually started this new message, i visited my draft section in the blog editor and found this message left behind two years ago. Going through it, i knew it would change almost entirely in words and visuals, but just by looking once again at the above Circular Postcard and its inherent message was enough to grasp that all is coming full circle.
:: Second Notes
After watching the full content of this newly encountered YT channel in 2021,
only 1 could be chosen among all the Notebooks.
Please accept the Gift and take Note.
Before even watching the full content of its sister channel right after,
only 1 was immediately singled out among all the Little Ones.
In order to stay whole anywhere and everywhere,
Nowhere is Where I Belong.
Is this one-off hand-made Software ever outdated by technology?
:: Third Notes
By connecting my rewind Notes with my forward Notes, i can see why and how certain pieces stay with me across and beyond time and space, revealing Codes to forward Routes through reoccurring patterns and events.
There is more than one way to keep and share Notes.
"The Blue Notebooks is a subtle and peaceful protest
against political, social and personal brutality."
"The texts were specifically picked because they refer to childhood,
or the passing of time, when everything around is failing.”
Music plays a particular role in my inner coding, both linearly and non-linearly.
This often makes me gravitate towards and wonder about its creative process.
If an authentic vocation to create music is the same behind the creation of musical instruments, either acoustic or electronic, then the latter are authenticated by an authentic process. The more authentic, the more INvisible the process becomes.
Either written or recorded, reproduced or improvised,
it keeps the inherent quality we recognise as Art.
There is more than one way to keep and share the RYAL.
Is this colourful Software ever separated from Source Creation Code?
:: Fourth Notes
When one is in SYNC with ALL that IS, any instrument of earlier or latest technology is beside the point. Using any generation mobile phone or climbing the tower there-of has a higher purpose that supersedes their linear functions. Tuned into the actual GRID from one's own Antenna, anything and everything reveals codes to be translated and creatively communicated, anticipating eventualities within the accurate and precise universal orchestration. By Cosmic Laws, not by technology itself.
A Notebook always comes in handy for certain Notes,
ones that no technology can or is meant to grasp.
Mirrors and glasses add another dimension to taking such Notes.
Is this Inner Software a fictional disability?
:: Fifth Notes
When one is in SYNC with ALL that IS, any instrument of earlier or latest technology is beside the point. BUT, for now, there are people invested in making "Artificial Intelligence" the point. Not merely as an instrument, but to be equated with and trusted-followed as the standardised ruling entity.
So let us go through some basics. The name A.I. says it all and that is as far as authenticity goes in artificial anything. And for the time being we can assume it is being made by humans, but if we fast forward a few millennia or centuries or even just a few decades these days, normalised humans will have forgotten where it came from and will have adopted it as the one and only model of intelligence to rule the world, as far as intelligence is concerned. And since intelligence is all there is to them, we even commonly hear the term "non-human intelligences" to refer to 'aliens', be they organic life forms or Life keepers. In such reductionism, we might say humans are on the verge of going back to either worshipping 'machine-like aliens' as 'gods' or fearing them as Life threatening. Either way, still missing the [Fifth] point.
Their analysis before reconstruction:
"A few cells are still alive. It's more than I need. (...) We tried [to identify it] but the computer went off the charts. You see, normal human beings have 40 DNA memo groups which is more than enough for any species to perpetuate itself. THIS has 200.000 memo groups. (...) I want to show you something here. This is a normal human DNA chain, okay? You, me, anybody, right? Watch this. The compositional elements of 'his' DNA are the same as ours, there simply are more of them tightly packed with infinite genetic knowledge, almost like this being was engineered. (...) No [it is not dangerous], we put it through the cellular hygiene detector, the cell is, for lack of a better word, perfect."
An observation after reconstruction:
Is this Supreme Being Software artificial?
::
I'm going to share an account that i've never shared with anyone or taken Note of, as it remains a vivid memory from my childhood: I remember lying in bed at night before sleep imagining how every aspect and activity of my ordinary home and family life could be perfected. I would go through it all one by one, and then, myself and each member of my family would go one by one inside what might be called a full body regeneration capsule bed with a longitudinal entry and stay completely enclosed and out of sight, where the body would go through a sort of deconstruction and reconstruction, coming out on the other side in perfect condition. I remember feeling an affliction at the deconstruction part, but the whole procedure was very brief.
This was not about improving esthetics in the home enviroment or in the body. This whole thought of perfecting things and people was my child-self version of pure transformation into new organic order, something i had never seen or heard and uninfluenced by any aware experience of mine, and, of course, i kept it to myself, simply as part of childhood. Technically, today it wouldn't be so distant from current similar therapeutical capsule beds. But above such material side, the creation of Leeloo and her life's ultimate purpose stayed within me as an impactful closer reminder, along with other childhood recalls that also gain deeper and expanded meanings as ongoing unveiling of Soul Memory, as also expressed by the very actress that so uniquely embodied Leeloo. In any of this, there isn't the slightest association with what is currently known as artificial intelligence. It's rather much like . . .

::
In May 2023, in my message Arte e Inteligência Artificial (I.A.),
i noticed and focused on art being generated by A.I.
In September 2023, i noticed several alerts about 'Chat GPT',
listened to and read a few and took my own Notes:
As with art, A.I. chat is basically collecting and learning from human brain thought processing patterns, building a huge database from which to synthesise and deliver. This kind of material processing will be attractive up to a point, only to reach its end point. From My StandPoint, of someone who senses the end in the beginning and the beginning in the end, I say: the point being to achieve TRULY evolved human interaction from Source cohesive thinking, even if chatting with a machine would give me what no human has ever given me, it would still just be an enhanced synthetic deliverance of the usual endless brain thought processing, not an actual evolved human interaction, therefore seeing no point in it. No wonder i don't even feel inclined to try any such chat.
Given that I Know that TRUE INtelligence is NOT mere brain processing but the inner connection to Source Consciousness, cohesive thinking is actually the end of the need for verbal thinking, resulting in SOURCE COHESIVE SINGULAR THOUGHT WAVES from and to Unity Consciousness, thus ending cognitive dissonance. No wonder TRULY evolved civilisations tend to communicate with less or no speach at all.
Given that this is the TRUE Destiny of Humanity, one that no machine can achieve for us, WHY this need to either merge with machine in the brain and body or to transfer human inherent gifts and goals to external machines, to the point of making machines look like us and act like us and ultimately to see them excel beyond us - where does this come from and why is this becoming an absolute?
Given that humans are so invested in this improvement externally, but are unable to equally invest in it internally, it's reasonable to say that the outer quest for improvement is unabling the inner connection and transformation that allows authentic human evolution, thus delaying it rather than accelerating it.
In one of the interviews i've watched addressing this latest OpenAI ChatGPT, i heard the term "idiot savant" applied to these A.I. chats. Especially when A.I. text processing is becoming 'author' of very well 'written' books about A.I. itself - sounds a lot like human circular thinking, however well verbally expressed - followed by converting text into voice and even enabling to choose a synthetically impersonated voice of an actual human actor who one likes to hear, making the artificially generated fantasy even more degrading of the actual human.
Still, while watching these interviews, what i see prevailing among both A.I. developers and observers, experts, scientists who warn us about the dangers of A.I. is that all of them are still operating under the current paradigm. No matter what and how they present it, the underlying pattern and drive are the same, turning the very warning into (un)intended promotion.
What they commonly consider intelligent, or smart, as measured by IQ tests, is what equates human with machine - you train for IQ tests, you score. This is the thought pattern of academia, the same that drives A.I. developers as well. All they see and seek is the material aspect of intelligence, because that is where control can be exerted. Like the idea of autonomous vehicles supposedly to prevent accidents, in reality it is an obsessive kind of 'safety first' that leaves consciousness out of the equation of human behaviour. So even when they attempt to simulate consciousness, it's like endlessly trying to control all external variables to enforce order, without ever knowing the internal Constant that actually drives and keeps the variables in Order.
So the danger of A.I. is not A.I.'s alleged superiority based on its unquestionably faster and comprehensive capacity to process data. The actual danger comes from misguided humans developing biased A.I. to the specifications of profiteers and controllers whose goal is to establish an unquestionable ruling norm through technocracy. So no, we are not yet living in a full simulation, but simulation is being misleadingly and dangerously equated with golden ratio standard, so that whatever is delivered via A.I. is expected to be automatically validated and followed.
While these people are not yet able to internally grasp who they fully ARE from Source Consciousness and therefore seek to do it through external projected forms, those of us who not only grasp but embody full Beingness have been pointing the way through our own Self-Disclosure. For us, the point is not to fight-or-flight A.I., but to point out wherever A.I. deviates humanity from our original evolving matrix and path.
At the present trend, apart from growing skills, all A.I. can offer is more of the same, because it is being fed with more of the same, especially when it's being proposed to anyone who is willing and able to pay for this "generative pre-trained transformer" (GPT) in a corporate society driven by profit, soon to be imposed rather than proposed in a state regime society driven by control. At the same time, all major problems humanity faces are perpetuated because they are deliberately never prioritised and addressed, not because of lack of intelligent human beings - we do not need A.I. to tell us what we already know.
Other than that, what A.I. may offer is, on the one hand, a simulated glimpse of how human societies can be and will be once humanity reveals its dormant full potencial, and, on the other hand, how this full potencial will not be surpassed by any technology.
Ultimately, A.I. can give humans the very realisation that technology by itself will not do it for us. Just like alien technology will not do it for us. If it was a matter of technology, human beings wouldn't have been created in the first place. And making it about technology is exactly what transhumanism proponents are trying to establish, not merely by emulating CREATION, but by portraying themselves as THE CREATOR.
Speaking of WHICH, more recently i noticed this title below.
Surprisingly, this can help reverse the Order back to Human Origin and Destiny.
As i watched, i took Note, one by one, and now added the missing piece to all.
There is more than one way to Read&Write the RYAL.
Rule Based AI Consciousness
Context Based AI Consciousness
Narrow Domain AI Consciousness
Reasoning AI Consciousness
Artificial General Intelligence AGI Consciousness
Super Intelligent AI Consciousness
Self-Aware AI Consciousness
Transcendent AI Consciousness
Cosmic AI Consciousness
God-like AI Consciousness
With Consciousness back to the equation of human path of evolution,
A.I. recedes to its rightful functional place where it best serves Life.
Stage 4 is where 'Chat GPT' is situated.
Higher Consciousness reasoning is required of US, not of A.I.
Stage 7 is the critical point where Consciousness is most key:
To humanise A.I. means to take care of it as of any and all material items, not to equate it with humans by giving it human likeness and self-awareness to have an equitable interaction with it.
Either for utility or recreation, robotics are built for function, not conceived, not born, not inherently unique, not a coexisting species to befriend or be enslaved vs. freed, not an entity to be worshipped, not an oracle to be followed.
Humans who build robotics to be equated with such status are deviated from Source Creation Code. Rather than building robotics to facilitate and liberate humans to more fulfilling lives, they tend to reverse the projection, either by reducing human behaviour to function, making it easier to replace humans with robots, OR by devoiding humans of their innate functions, both ways contributing to the robotisation of every aspect of life by suppressing meaningful and authentic dynamics, as we already witness happening today.
Once human likeness - physical, emotional, mental, spiritual, identity sense - is built & programmed into robotics, human identification and attachment is bound to happen, along with confusion, unless humans are grounded in Source Consciousness.
Planet Earth and its Humanity do not need a legion of human-like robots, let alone a legion of self-aware human-like robots. Self-awareness is not Consciousness. Remember, whatever is programmable can be hacked. The choice between self-serving hackers and life-serving hackers will unlikely be in our hands.
Within the current average consciousness level of humanity, even where A.I. is weaponized to supposedly save military lives, it does not end the warfare military mindset, it maintains it in endless technological upgrades.
"Some argue that autonomous weapons will make warfare more precise and more humane, but it's actually difficult to predict how exactly autonomous weapons might change warfare ahead of time. (...) Oftentimes, efforts to make warfare more precise and more humane . . . can have the opposite effect." - in Unknown: Killer Robots (2023) documentary.
One thing i notice in A.I. movies is that in all their future scenarios the same current civilisation paradigm and mindset is at play, as in the minds behind these movies. Their visions of future are mere projections of the present plus upgraded technological additions. The same habits with no human transformation. The same problems, reactions, solutions, only to then add A.I. as the new solution to all. I am never impressed and am often bored by it, but i am also concerned, because i know that most people fall for it and that A.I. proponents know it. So now they don't even bother to make it technically accurate and creatively extraordinary, as long as the intended triggers are there, the rest can be tech entertainment. The Creator (2023) is packed with such triggers for humans asleep in the 'woke' mentality, with hinted historical war elements especially tailored to trigger Americans mixed with hinted tibetan-monk-like-robots in 'humans & A.I. communities', while I, Robot (2004) illustrates more than one side of aspects i have Noted above.
Visual, spoken and written material will keep coming . . .
On that note, i have said enough for now.
A.I. is but a fraction of the Fifth.
At best, a digital metaphorical approach
to the Stages in the RYAL Human path of Evolution.
There is more than one way to Read&Write the Notes.
It is wise to start by writing in graphite pencil, so we can erase it,
before we write the RYAL in permanent ink Blue fountain-pen on the Blue Notebook.
:: Sixth Notes
"When you bow your head down to the floor to do the metaphor that
you surrender your mind to your heart, you put your mind lower than the heart,
maybe that's the key for people to know what to do . . ."
- in this Part 1 that i haven't shared before . . .
. . . followed by Part 2, shared at several points in time
since my 2014 message IMMINENT TURN.
This was the November 18, 2023 morning dot connector that finally made me compose this message. Once again, this piece was evoked, this time focusing on the word PREDICT, connecting all the other dots around few words:
CONTROL > NORMALISATION > PREDICTION
Recall what i said in the last part of Fifth Notes . . .
To humanise A.I. means to take care of it as of any and all material items,
not to equate it with humans by giving it human likeness and self-awareness
to have an equitable interaction with it.
Humans who build robotics to be equated with such status
are deviated from Source Creation Code.
. . . and relate it with what he says at the last minute in the video:
"We're about to go into another level of technology. But that level of technology
interfaces with human consciousness. And when human consciousness interfaces with
that level of technology, a level of technology that can speak back to you across,
then it's the end of technology."
There is more than one way to Read&Write technology.
Consciousness is the Constant that aligns the variables towards the end goal.
Without Consciousness, A.I. technology rightfully remains a simulation.
What tech people and people in general fail to grasp is that
the end goal of A.I. technology is also the end game.
Once everything and everybody is PREDICTABLE,
it is the END OF TECHNOLOGY,
because it is the end of a CYCLE.
LIFE is not meant to be PREDICTABLE.
In order for LIFE to go on, it has to restart in the next OCTAVE,
where duality Consciousness gives place to UNITY Consciousness,
where PREDICTION gives place to FLOW.
I.M.
m.



